How long do I have to contest a trust in California?

You have 120 days from receiving proper notification about the trust to file a trust contest in California. This deadline is strictly enforced, and while limited exceptions exist for late contests, courts rarely extend the deadline, making prompt action essential for protecting your rights.

The 120-Day Rule for Trust Contests

California Probate Code Section 16061.7 establishes specific deadlines:

  • 120-day deadline: Contest must be filed within 120 days of receiving notification
  • Proper notification required: Must receive legally compliant notice of trust terms
  • Strict enforcement: Courts rarely accept late filings without compelling reasons
  • Finality purpose: Deadline provides certainty for trust administration

What Triggers the 120-Day Clock

The deadline begins when you receive proper notification containing:

  • Trust terms: Copy of the complete trust document or relevant portions
  • Trustee identity: Name and contact information of current trustee
  • Legal notice language: Specific statutory language about contest rights
  • Trustor's death notification: Notice that the trust has become irrevocable
  • Beneficiary status: Information about your rights under the trust

Types of Trust Contest Notification

Section 16061.7 Notice

Standard trust notification includes:

  • Complete disclosure: All terms that affect the beneficiary
  • Contest deadline warning: Specific language about 120-day limit
  • Trustee contact information: How to reach the trustee
  • Legal rights explanation: Summary of beneficiary rights

Incomplete or Improper Notice

If notice is defective, the deadline may not start:

  • Missing required information: Incomplete trust terms or legal language
  • Improper service: Notice not delivered according to legal requirements
  • Misleading information: Incorrect or deceptive trust terms
  • No actual knowledge: Beneficiary unaware of trust existence

Valid Grounds for Trust Contests

Lack of Mental Capacity

Challenging the trustor's mental capacity when trust was created or amended:

  • Dementia or cognitive decline: Medical evidence of mental impairment
  • Mental illness: Psychiatric conditions affecting judgment
  • Medication effects: Drugs impairing mental clarity
  • Medical testimony: Expert evidence about capacity
  • Witness observations: Family or caregiver testimony

Undue Influence

Proving improper influence over trust creation:

  • Caregiver manipulation: Care providers who benefit from trust
  • Family coercion: Relatives who isolated trustor
  • Confidential relationships: Abuse of trust by advisors
  • Sudden changes: Dramatic alterations to previous plans
  • Isolation tactics: Cutting off contact with other family

Fraud and Forgery

  • Document fraud: False representations inducing trust creation
  • Forged signatures: Fake trustor or witness signatures
  • Altered documents: Changes made after execution
  • Concealed facts: Hiding material information from trustor

Improper Execution

  • Witness deficiencies: Problems with witness requirements
  • Notarization issues: Improper notarial acts
  • Signature problems: Questions about authentic signatures
  • Procedural violations: Failure to follow legal formalities

Late Trust Contest Exceptions

Limited Circumstances Allowing Late Filing

Courts may consider late contests when:

  • Fraud concealment: Active concealment prevented timely discovery
  • Lack of actual knowledge: Beneficiary genuinely unaware of trust
  • Defective notice: Notice failed to meet legal requirements
  • Incapacity during notice period: Beneficiary legally incapacitated
  • Duress or threats: Prevented from filing timely contest

Factors Courts Consider for Late Contests

  • Actual knowledge timing: When beneficiary learned of trust terms
  • Reason for delay: Legitimate explanation for late filing
  • Prejudice to others: Whether delay harms other beneficiaries
  • Strength of contest grounds: Evidence supporting the challenge
  • Good faith basis: Reasonable belief contest has merit

Trust Contest Process and Strategy

Pre-Filing Investigation

Before filing contest, investigate thoroughly:

  • Document collection: Gather medical records, previous trusts, communications
  • Witness interviews: Talk to people who knew trustor
  • Expert consultation: Medical or handwriting experts as needed
  • Financial analysis: Review changes in asset distribution
  • Legal research: Understand applicable law and precedents

Contest Filing Requirements

  • Standing to contest: Prove you're an interested party
  • Specific allegations: Detail grounds for challenge
  • Supporting evidence: Include documentation with petition
  • Requested relief: Specify what outcome you seek
  • Legal compliance: Follow all court procedural rules

Alternatives to Trust Contests

Trust Modifications and Settlements

  • Beneficiary agreements: Negotiate changes with all parties
  • Court-approved modifications: Seek judicial approval for changes
  • Mediation: Use neutral mediator to resolve disputes
  • Family settlement conferences: Informal negotiations

Petition Alternatives

  • Section 850 petitions: Recover trust property
  • Heggstad petitions: Add assets to trust
  • Trustee removal petitions: Replace unsuitable trustee
  • Accounting petitions: Require trustee financial reporting

Costs and Risks of Trust Contests

Financial Considerations

  • Attorney fees: Hourly rates for complex litigation
  • Expert witness costs: Medical, forensic, or financial experts
  • Discovery expenses: Depositions and document production
  • Court costs: Filing fees and related expenses
  • Fee shifting risks: Potential responsibility for other side's costs

No-Contest Clauses

Many trusts include provisions that:

  • Penalize unsuccessful contestants: Forfeit inheritance for losing challenges
  • Require probable cause: Good faith basis protects from penalty
  • Limited enforceability: California law limits harsh no-contest clauses
  • Strategic analysis needed: Weigh contest strength against penalty risk

Professional Guidance for Trust Disputes

Experienced trust litigation attorneys provide:

  • Deadline monitoring: Ensure compliance with all filing deadlines
  • Case evaluation: Realistic assessment of contest viability
  • Evidence development: Professional investigation and expert coordination
  • Strategic planning: Develop strongest case presentation
  • Settlement negotiation: Explore resolution alternatives

Protecting Against Trust Contests

Trust creators can minimize contest risks by:

  • Proper execution: Follow all legal formalities
  • Capacity documentation: Medical evaluations when appropriate
  • Independent counsel: Separate attorney representation
  • Family communication: Discuss trust provisions with family
  • Regular updates: Keep trust current with changing circumstances

Trust vs. Will Contest Differences

Trust contests differ from will contests in:

  • Notification requirements: Trust contests require specific notice
  • Deadline triggers: Different events start the time limit
  • Privacy levels: Trust contests may be more private
  • Administration timing: Trust administration often begins before contests

Key takeaway: California's 120-day deadline for trust contests is strictly enforced and begins when you receive proper legal notification. Given the complexity of trust law and the harsh consequences of missing deadlines, potential contestants should consult experienced trust litigation attorneys immediately upon learning of concerning circumstances to evaluate their rights and develop appropriate legal strategies.

Philip J. Kavesh
Helping clients with customized estate planning guidance and trust & estate administration for over 44 years.