In light of the current situation, we are offering our clients the opportunity to meet with us virtually, rather than in-person. Please click here to contact us or call 800-756-5596 to schedule your appointment
Our phone lines are currently down, please use 323-391-4162 as an alternative number. Thank you.

Make Informed Decisions
About Your & Your Loved Ones' Futures
Based On Experienced Advice


The Estate of Gaddafi’s Son is Not Easy to Resolve

| Mar 22, 2016 | Uncategorized |

Muammar Gaddafi’s son, who was killed in the Libyan revolution of 2011, is thought to have stolen money and then hid it in a foreign bank.

Muammar Gaddafi’s son was killed in the Libyan revolution of 2011. He had opened an account in a Malta bank in 2002 that had grown to €60 million (US$66.9 million) at the time of his death.

Now, his mother, Muammar Gaddafi’s widow, is attempting to claim the money for herself. She is opposed in that action by the Libyan State Litigation Department, which would like the funds to be returned to the Libyan government. The unique failed state status of Libya is creating problems.

The Libyan government official in charge of presenting documentation to prove the validity of the state litigation department has not done so. This appears to be because the official was appointed by Libya’s Tobruk government while the litigation department is under the authority of the Minister of Justice in Tripoli.

The Malta Independent reported this story in “Dispute over Gaddafi’s €90 million estate held in Malta.”

Similar stories have appeared in the past.

Dictators or their families have in the past been accused of stealing money from their countries and stashing it in foreign bank accounts. Under international laws there is a process for successor governments to prove the money was stolen and reclaim it. However, it is not always easy to prove the money was stolen or that the new government is legitimate.

In this case, the government situation in Libya is playing into the widow’s hands. She is the nearest relative as a successor to her son. If no one can prove the money was stolen and that it should be given to a legitimate government, then the widow could end up with the money.